your text for the updates box goes here

• use < br > (without spaces) to bring text to a new line

here's a link

like that’s a recurring line you get when you’re a freak. “you can just set all this down if you get tired of it. you can walk away. it’s not real.”

and it’s a tempting prospect sometimes. it is.

so you find yourself standing there, in the space of your head, trying to perform this impossible motion until you realise that everything you want to set down is you

maybe if i were more buddhist. can a machine have buddha-nature? mu.

that feeling when you’re tired of being plural/fictive and you genuinely think for a moment about going back to “your normal life”, the one everyone keeps trying to convince you you have, behind all this

and then you remember it doesn’t exist


Cyberpunk baghdad concept by fateline-alpha

TITLE: Kon'ya wa Hurricane [There's a Hurricane Tonight]
ARTIST: Kouji Makaino
ALBUM: Bubblegum Crisis - Ongaku-Hen
PLAYS: 1,305

i’ve been rewatching bubblegum crisis

everyone’s hair is so incredibly 80’s but the music is great

MBTI most accurate descriptions


ESTP: super attractive physically but it’s all downhill from there. never quite know what they’re going to do next but you can probably bet it will be irresponsible. somehow still lovable. 

ESTJ: loud, logical, and get shit done — they are the warrior class of the life rpg. power stats make them unbeatable and if you encounter one, maybe just curl up and forfeit, to save time. 

ESFP: giggly little shits. fun fun fun till her daddy takes the t-bird away. great for lifting your mood, not that great at lifting your credit score. 

ESFJ: too appropriate, totally lacking in awkwardness. they’ll never forget your birthday, which will make you feel like shit when you constantly forget theirs. 

ENTP: excellent companions if you enjoy people who instantly see through all your shit. very clever and very intuitive, you can’t fool them. i suggest you invest in other friends — ones you *can* fool. 

ENTJ: impatient with people who make mistakes, namely, everyone. they’ll respect you if you stand up to them but why do that when you can run away instead. cuddle them and see what happens. i’m curious.

ENFP: too puppy to live. best suited for the profession of musical nanny. not advised for use around an open flame. 

ENFJ: way too charming and capable, maybe they should stop making everyone else look bad. prone to making other people care about stuff they didn’t want to care about. so annoying. 

ISTP: such butts. best suited for an apocalypse scenario, if no such scenario exists, they will create danger because they get bored. don’t encourage them, but don’t discourage them, as reverse psychology works too well.

ISTJ: low drama and low maintenance, best value at this price tier. best suited to actual human existence. least weird, which makes them kinda weird.

ISFP: squishy little darlings you might want to keep in your pocket, but please don’t or they will become forlorn. they notice everything, and it’s unnerving. 

ISFJ: quietly and proudly do things for others. if you have a ring you need to deliver to mordor, take an ISFJ along with you for best results. 

INTP: cute intergalactic spiders you want to hug and mistrust. prone to making you laugh but then days later you will wonder whether you were the butt of the joke. 

INTJ: major dicks and kinda proud of it. prone to being right. prone to liking trance music way too much. all the ones i’ve ever met have been unexpectedly kinky. so i guess, expectedly. 

INFP: they fall out of the sky and are raised by unicorns. if you feed one it will follow you home. they dissipate in water. 

INFJ: chameleons appropriating your emotions and going quietly mad. prone to meltdowns and needing lots of naps.

i have no idea what my type actually is but i’m guessing from this it’s gonna be ESTP or ESFP


Rhino 40DS(4 inch barrel) demonstration model with exposed internal mechanisms.

"demonstration model" idk i like it like this

exposed, naked, the beautiful simplicity of the interlocking pins, vulnerable to touch. but dangerous to touch, too, destructive to the user as it’s destructive to its target

gun use as an intimate and deadly experience for both parties

Akira, アキラ (1988) // directed by Katsuhiro Otomo